Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, Welsh first minister Mark Drakeford was at all times vying to outdo the UK authorities within the authoritarian stakes. He would repeatedly sneak out a press launch forward of the Tories, saying some new type of restriction on on a regular basis life – all to indicate that he was proudly main the intolerant assaults on civil liberties.
It appears he’s at it once more. Final yr, Wales volunteered to be the primary nation within the UK to undertake a 20-miles-per-hour pace restrict to make us all drive extra slowly. And earlier this month, the brand new pace restrict got here into impact in all residential and built-up areas all through the principality. It has already confirmed enormously unpopular. A public petition in opposition to the coverage now has almost 400,000 signatures.
This public resistance is hardly a shock. It’s unhealthy sufficient attempting to get wherever at pace in Wales at the very best of occasions, however this imposition means extra inconvenience and irritation for the put-upon motorist. And it might quickly be coming to the remainder of the UK. For the reason that enforcement of pace restrictions in Wales, native councils from Cornwall to Oxford, Liverpool to Lambeth have proposed related measures and 20-miles-per-hour indicators are cropping up in all places.
The proponents of this decrease pace restrict declare that it’s going to save lives. They trot out the acquainted traces that in case your automotive hits a pedestrian at 30 miles per hour the probabilities of her or him being killed are one in 5. But when the pedestrian is struck at 20 miles per hour the probabilities of dying are one in 40. This oft-repeated argument journeys off the tongue of road-safety campaigners and anti-car activists with little substantiation. Within the curiosity of security, they are saying, what’s so exhausting about driving that little bit slower? If it saves the lifetime of only one little one, they are saying, why hurry?
However does it save lives? Analysis carried out final yr by Queen’s College Belfast suggests not. It reveals that the current introduction of 20-miles-per-hour pace limits throughout the Northern Irish capital has not led to a big discount in road-traffic collisions and casualties.
It appears the Welsh authorities is just not actually attempting to unravel an issue. It merely needs to impose but extra restraint on the wayward habits of so-called irresponsible drivers. Certainly, it’s not clear that there’s a downside of street security to unravel. The Division of Transport’s present (provisional) figures for Nice Britain present that three per cent fewer folks at the moment are killed on the roads than in 2019. That is a part of a longer-term development. Highway fatalities throughout the UK have been in decline for over half a century, falling from a postwar peak of seven,966 fatalities in 1966 (when there have been simply eight million vehicles within the UK) to 1,390 fatalities in 2021 (when there have been over 32million vehicles).
It’s removed from good. However such an enchancment in street security remains to be one thing to have fun reasonably than a cause to say that one thing extra should be finished.
In some methods, in relation to street security, there’s an excessive amount of give attention to vehicles and never sufficient on pedestrians’ personal behaviour. In any case, the statistics present that many pedestrians share some accountability for street accidents. The UK authorities’s evaluation of road-traffic accidents notes that the commonest contributory issue allotted to pedestrians concerned in deadly or critical collisions with one other automobile is that they ‘didn’t look correctly’. Different vital contributory components embody pedestrians being ‘impaired by alcohol’, ‘taking part in within the carriageway’ or utilizing the ‘fallacious’ pedestrian crossing.
Too typically pedestrians concerned in street accidents are usually not anticipated to bear any accountability. They’re merely seen as victims. But because the RAC’s personal knowledge reveals, in 2022, 46 per cent of all road-traffic fatalities have been automotive occupants, whereas 22 per cent have been pedestrians and 5 per cent fatalities have been cyclists. So some drivers are killed by reckless pedestrians, however there’s no outrage about that in any respect.
However it’s not simply the dearth of substance behind the Welsh authorities’s case for a 20-miles-per-hour pace restrict that rankles. Drakeford’s ‘concern’ for the well being of the Welsh folks does, too, given the perilous state of healthcare in Wales. The British Medical Affiliation is anxious that with out extra funding and workers, GP companies ‘will collapse in Wales and the NHS will observe’. But Drakeford is ready to spend £32.5million on this speed-reduction marketing campaign on the fallacious grounds that it’s going to save the NHS ‘£92million each single yr’. That is simply one other approach to excuse the parlous state of the well being service by blaming its potential customers. On this case, for injuring themselves in street accidents.
Certainly, Drakeford appears eager to keep away from dealing with as much as the issues of the Welsh NHS by encouraging folks to not use it. This contains reinventing it as a part of some kind of ‘wellness’ system. On this courageous new world, in accordance with a Welsh authorities doc, ‘folks will take accountability, not just for their very own well being and wellbeing, but additionally for his or her household and for folks they take care of, even perhaps for his or her associates and neighbours’. In different phrases, Drakeford needs to scale back the pressures on the well being service by decreasing the variety of folks coming to hospital within the first place. In any case, why race to a poorly outfitted hospital while you may be cared for at house. Why pace to A&E and danger an accident? What’s the hurry?
That’s the message from Drakeford: decelerate, save lives, shield the NHS.
Austin Williams is director of the Future Cities Venture.
To investigate about republishing spiked’s content material, a proper to answer or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.