Embattled Harvard College president Claudine Homosexual thinks she has an answer to the spike in anti-Semitism on her campus: increase the college’s range, fairness and inclusion (DEI) programme. In saying her schooling and coaching plan, ‘Combating Anti-Semitism’, earlier this month, Homosexual stated that Harvard will ‘construct on the preliminary steps taken’ by its DEI workplace ‘to extra totally combine anti-Semitism into the work of that workplace’.

Alumni have accused Homosexual of failing to reply robustly. In an impassioned post on X, Wall Avenue investor and Harvard alumnus Invoice Ackman wrote that he had ‘misplaced confidence that you simply and the college will do what’s required’.

Homosexual’s first reactions to the 7 October bloodbath, and the pro-Hamas sentiment on campus that emerged shortly after, revealed an indifference to the plight of Israelis and Jewish college students. Her first assertion didn’t condemn Hamas. Nor did she distance Harvard from a letter written by the college’s Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity Committee and co-signed by 33 different campus organisations, which held ‘the Israeli regime completely accountable’ for the 7 October assault. A robust backlash led Homosexual to make additional statements a number of days later that did denounce Hamas’s terrorism and the scholars’ letter, however these sounded extra grudging than honest.

Homosexual was fast to couple her criticisms of Hamas with a defence of the pro-Palestine protesters, saying Harvard ‘embraces a dedication to free expression’. In reality, this ‘dedication’ is non-existent: the Basis for Particular person Rights and Expression (FIRE) gave Harvard its worst attainable ranking totally free speech this 12 months, scoring it 0.00 out of 100. On loads of contentious points in recent times, such because the dying of George Floyd, Homosexual and different Harvard leaders have been outspoken and forthright, however when it got here to Hamas’s pogrom, they’ve felt the necessity to sofa their response in ‘either side’ drivel.

Actions converse louder than phrases, and the college’s first initiative was telling. It was to not help Jewish college students. As a substitute, the college arrange a job power in late October to ‘help college students experiencing doxxing, harassment and on-line safety points following [a] backlash towards college students allegedly affiliated with a press release that held Israel “completely accountable” for violence within the Israel-Hamas battle’. It’s no surprise that Jewish college students and alumni query Homosexual’s dedication to opposing anti-Semitism.

Extra DEI, as Homosexual proposes, is not going to remedy what ails Harvard. The ideology behind DEI treats individuals as monolithic embodiments of their racial, sexual and different identities, relatively than as people. It’s also not ‘inclusive’. As Harvard’s Workplace of Fairness, Range, Inclusion and Belonging (OEDIB) mission assertion says: ‘We actively search and welcome individuals of color, ladies, individuals with disabilities, individuals who establish as LGBTQIA, and those that are on the intersections of those identities… to hitch us.’ There isn’t a room for a lot of Asians, whites and Jews, who’re considered with suspicion if not outright hostility by DEI advocates.

DEI ideology fuels animosity in direction of Jews particularly. A foundational precept of DEI is to oppose ‘whiteness’, and, in its schematic racial hierarchy, Jews are considered as hyper-white. Whereas DEI simplistically asserts that under-representation of any given racial group is de facto proof of discrimination, it additionally finds the over-representation of Jews (who’re roughly two per cent of the US inhabitants) in sure areas of American society to be problematic. Additional, the DEI worldview considers Israel to be a ‘genocidal’, ‘settler colonialist’ state and thus an ‘oppressor’. Jews within the US are then lumped in with Israel. As we noticed after 7 October, being labelled an ‘oppressor’ by DEI successfully dehumanises individuals – it could possibly result in justifying or celebrating probably the most barbaric acts of terrorism towards the supposed ‘oppressors’, together with infants and grandmothers.

The military of DEI directors who now oversee American campuses are the purveyors of this ideology. One research discovered that DEI workers ‘categorical anti-Israel attitudes which can be so out of proportion and imbalanced as to represent anti-Semitism’. When Stanford College was accused of ignoring anti-Semitic incidents, its DEI committee dismissed the allegations, stating that as a result of ‘Jews, not like different minority group[s], possess privilege and energy, Jews and victims of Jew-hatred don’t benefit or necessitate the eye of the DEI committee’.

Even earlier than the eruption of anti-Semitism following the 7 October assault, there have been indications that Harvard was not a hospitable place for Jewish college students. A current report discovered that Harvard had extra incidents of anti-Semitism than every other US college in 2021-2022. An undergrad’s senior thesis on anti-Jewish exercise at Harvard discovered that about two-thirds of Jewish college students had skilled anti-Semitism on campus.

It’s telling that Homosexual says anti-Semitism must be ‘extra totally built-in’ with DEI at Harvard. She’s successfully admitting that anti-Semitism has not likely been a priority of DEI to this point. The fact is that the DEI workplace has not simply ignored anti-Semitism. It has additionally been instrumental in selling anti-Semitic speech and actions on campus – not least by way of its help for organisations such because the Palestine Solidarity Committee, which accuses Zionists of being ‘racists’ and ‘white supremacists’, and the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) marketing campaign, which seeks to make Israel a pariah state.

It’s not stunning that Homosexual reached for higher emphasis on DEI in her response, as she’s been a eager promoter of that ideology throughout her profession. Certainly, Homosexual, a black lady, could be thought-about Harvard’s first DEI rent for president. As David Randall of the Nationwide Affiliation of Students identified final 12 months, her tutorial CV is the thinnest of any president in current reminiscence (she has printed solely 11 articles and has by no means written a ebook – Lawrence Summers, one in every of Harvard’s former presidents, produced extra in a single 12 months).

In her prior position as Harvard’s dean of the School of Arts and Sciences, Homosexual was described was the ‘the enforcer-in-chief of wokist orthodoxy at Harvard’. In 2019, she backed a mob of scholars and school searching for to oust regulation professor Ronald Sullivan for becoming a member of the authorized defence workforce of Harvey Weinstein, and determined to not renew Sullivan’s contract. In one other intolerant cancellation, Homosexual led a committee that suspended economist Roland Fryer for 2 years with out pay following trumped-up prices of sexual harassment (based on the New York Publish, an investigation discovered that he had flirted with a graduate pupil, and a lady he fired discovered his language annoying). Critics have lengthy suspected that Homosexual singled out Fryer for harsh punishment as a result of his analysis findings undermined the Black Lives Matter narrative, displaying that black People should not disproportionately subjected to police brutality.

Homosexual’s response to anti-Semitism is an try to supply an administrative resolution to an educational and cultural drawback. Boosting the military of directors, and smothering controversial matters in bureaucratic job forces and committees, has turn into an ordinary transfer by college presidents to defuse conflicts. Homosexual’s doubling-down on DEI places college students and school within the again seat, and offers delight of place to the DEI directors. Her plan for combating anti-Semitism additionally consists of asking college students to show to the DEI workplace’s anonymous-bias-reporting hotline. Higher use of this Stasi-like snitch system, which has already poisoned campus tradition, will solely empower the DEI police, not college students.

What begins in the present day at Harvard, arguably the US’s most iconic college, is more likely to flip up tomorrow at different universities. It could be that revamping DEI to incorporate opposing anti-Semitism will turn into the brand new technique adopted by the schooling institution. It was notable that, at a current congressional listening to, a Democratic Social gathering witness stated DEI ‘could be enhanced, and the individuals I work with have tailored and are defending Jews now’.

However Jewish college students and others shouldn’t fall for this bureaucratic manoeuvre. It’s a entice. In relation to DEI’s victimhood olympics, Jews will at all times be thought-about extra privileged and therefore much less worthy. It will be demeaning for Jewish college students to must play the DEI sufferer recreation and beg for defense from these parasitic ideologues.

The DEI paperwork has fostered a hostile atmosphere for Jews on campus. Anticipating these bureaucrats to battle anti-Semitism is ludicrous. The explosion of woke anti-Semitism on campus has uncovered the necessity to shut down college DEI programmes, not increase them. Establishing frequent human values at universities – a precondition for the shared seek for reality, the college’s true mission – would require eradicating DEI tribalism.

Sean Collins is a author primarily based in New York. Go to his weblog, The American State of affairs.